Round Six out of six concludes this series reporting my first chess tournament in half a lifetime. It has been quite the experience. This round was quite the rollercoaster, and considering there has been some rollypolly games it was rather fitting.
The week before was a bit of a blur. It was according to my Fitbit my worst week of sleep. (Average of 5 hours 40 mins over the week, which I'm sure insomniacs and Margaret Thatcher would find a luxury but it took its toll.) I had thought I knew my opponent but barely had time to do much about it. I did my analysis practice but I had a pretty bad streak on that too that sunk my rating. The omens were not good.
I walked in to find the hall relatively unpopulated and about half of the competitors "taking a bye". If you cannot come for any reason, you can the equivalent of a draw, 0.5 points but no rating change, etc. I don't really know why they did that, whether they were aiming for a good overall result and their previous rounds hadn't been ideal, or it was end of the year and they were busy. Either way, my predicted opponent was among the "byes". In his place was the slightly bigger brother of my Round 3 opponent, all 13 years of him. He approached the board with a face of utter distain and disinterest. I only knew later, but that is just him being him. He's a nice young man.
Anyway, I had white; the clock struck 7pm and were off; my opponent played the Sicilian and I replied the way the Round One game should have gone:
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. c3 - the Delayed Alapin; this is what I have played recently against the Sicilian, except in that first round game went when I was mesmerised into playing the Open Sicilian which I have no experience.
We continued: 3. ... d5 4. exd5 Qxd5 5. d4 b6?! Despite his face of distain, up to this point he was immediately playing the main line of the Delayed Alapin - he knew his stuff. But with his last move he takes it into unknown seas for me. I've never seen this before and I didn't think it was good. It wasn't, but as he said after the game, he plays it because no-one else does and so have to figure it out over the board. Tricky little fella, huh.
6. Na3 Bb7 7. Bc4 Qd7? 8. d5! (?) For you Dearest Non-Chessplaying-But-Reading-Along-Anyway Reader, you will probably be tired of references to what the computer says. The computer will sometimes spit out the inhuman, impossible moves; but often it sheds a light on how best to play and can be quite instructive. The funniest thing about this game is that I played this move completely blind of his next move, which I inexplicably didn't see. I thought I was winning when I was clearly not. He played his next move, 8. ... O-O-O and I was plunged into cold water. I hadn't seen his obvious move at point blank range. And it was now a thorny position. I spent about 20 minutes peering at it. I saw some tricks but none of them forcing. It looked like I had just surrendered a pawn and would be on the back foot.
Except, on returning home and looking for the best move, the computer again spat out: 8. d5! It is significantly stronger than anything else. When the computer evaluates a position, it will give a number positive is an advantage to white, negative to black, with 1.0 roughly equivalent to being a pawn up, 3 points for a bishop or knight, 5 points roughly for a rook, and 9 points for a queen. The move d5! in response to his Qd7 changes the evaluation from 1.0 to 4.5! Essentially the position is gives me about half a queen advantage. But I played it without knowing what the computer knew and I was the one sweating bullets in this "difficult" position. Not surprisingly, my moves were not what the computer thought were the best.
9. Bf4? Qf5 10. Qd2? - Now the computer evaluation dropped back to 1.0; I was still "winning" in bytes, but thinking I was losing. I spent another 20 minutes on Qd2. Remember I have 75 minutes to start the game (and 30 extra seconds for each move I play). So, my last two moves took half of my time for the whole game. And they weren't great moves. Meanwhile he was taking only a minute or two per move, still with over an hour on his clock.
My last move was a cunning move, though - there are plenty of ways for him to proceed that I thought would give him a strong advantage and one that does not. It is a trap which I am proud to say I had spotted and analysed. And after a minutes thought he played exactly that: 10. ... e5?? 11. dxc6 11. Rxd2 12. cxb7+ Kxb7 13. Bxd2
His e5 move looked strong but he allows me to "sacrifice" my queen. It isn't really because it will cost him two pieces and a rook for my queen and a pawn. Using that maths from above, I was taking 11 points of material and giving away 10 points. Generally speaking, if coordinated, three pieces including a rook would be much better than a queen. After the game he admitted that he hadn't even seen it. He saw that my 11th move would lose the queen so he didn't need to analyse any further. Now he was taking more time! I thought I was winning now, although the computer is a dick and only says I have a 2 point advantage.
Both of us now try consolidating after the aftermath of the massive material exchange: 13. ... e4 14. Ng5 Nh6 15. O-O Be7 It was here that I had another moment of blindness. It would be easy to explain it with the lack of sleep, but generally it is unforgiveable: I saw a combination that would win me a pawn. But it didn't - it simply lose a knight for the pawn: 16. Nxe4! (?) Qxe4 17. Rae1 Qh4. Somehow I missed his very obvious saving move.
But, incredibly, and unbeknownst to all concerned. It wasn't a blunder. It isn't the best move but doesn't move the computer's needle much. It still had me with a 2 point advantage. Thinking I was losing, I started playing faster: 18. g3 Qf6 19. Nc2?
It's only now that the two players agree with the computer: Black is now winning.
19. ... Nf5 20. Ne3 Nxe3 21. Bxe3 Rd8 22. h4 Qg6 23. Re2? Bxh4
And now I blunder a pawn. I didn't even see it before he snatched it from the board with glee.
24. Bf4 Bf6? 25. Rfe1 - out of the carnage finally my pieces are now all working together, though fewer in number than before. And what's more, I have my first real concrete threat. There is a checkmate in the position, which would get some weaker players. He spent a lot of time before settling on: 25. ... Rd7? - which apparently can lead to a draw, which I was not able to see. Instead, my calculation fails be again and I miss a significant point in my kamikaze attack: 26. Bb5 Rd8 27. Re7+? Bxe7 28. Rxe7+ Ka8!
It must be said his analysis is pretty good. He found his way through the threats and probably both of us thought I was busted. But after some self-loathing I found one unexpected resource: 29. Be2!
29. ... Rd3! - There were only two moves to keep the advantage and this move was the best. It shut down my threats and offers me a chance to simplify. It might have been the tiredness but I thought that was the only realistic strategy and went for it, not seeing a more active continuation:
30. Bxd3? Qxd3 31. Rxf7?? Qd1+ - and it was over. My 13 year old opponent took no time spotting an easy tactic which I again missed to win my rook. Child's play, in every sense of the word. Before he could, I offered my hand in resignation.
.gif)
With a disinterested look, he happily agreed to analyse the game with me. And with distain he shared his worries and his own heart-in-mouth moments. He got revenge for his brother; and even though they are numerically rated quite similarly, this one demonstrated with his understanding in analysis that he is the strongest at this time. I chatted a bit with his dad and I congratulated him on the new addition to the family, another daughter, or as he put it, another chessplayer.
So, the tournament is over: 2 wins, 2 draws, 2 losses, both with white. Almost all the games were full of intrigue, attack and possibility. All had things to learn and think about. I probably won't play another tournament till February but think I can try my best to discipline my thoughts, improve my openings and analysis and win more games in the future.
Thank you for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment